During this year’s Abu Dhabi Desert Challenge, where I was
marshalling all week, I got to thinking about motor vehicle noise. It’s obvious
that racing cars and bikes produce a lot more noise than normal road vehicles.
Bikes on the Desert Challenge may not exceed 115dB(A) at 2
metres when inspected at the scrutineering just prior to the event. That’s very
loud indeed, and it was just as well the test that was being carried out on
each competitor just a few metres from where I was working only took a couple
of seconds. It’s a lot louder than normal road vehicles, for which I suspect
most of us are grateful.
Quoting numbers of decibels is actually pretty meaningless
without specifying the distance from the source. The further away you are, the
quieter the sound. By way of example, in the United States, the Federal limit from
the EPA for motorcycle noise is 80dB(A) at 50 feet. Some high-school physics tells
us that this is the same as 109dB(A) at 20 inches, or 98dB(A) at 2 metres. So
when New Hampshire specifies a limit of 106dB(A) at 20 inches, this is
actually fairly close to the EPA limit. The whole issue of distance is
deliberately obfuscated by manufacturers of after-market horns: “138dB(A),” the
blurb says, “at 100mm.” That’s 112dB(A) at 2 metres. It’s still a lot louder
than the comedy horns fitted by most vehicle manufacturers, but less than the
noise made by Marc Coma and his buddies on the ADDC.
Here’s the thing. There are plenty of people who believe
that motorcycles alone are responsible for antisocial vehicle noise. If you
live in JBR in Dubai, or the Pearl in Doha and you’re not deaf as a post, you’ll
have been disturbed by the late-night antics of the Inadequate Silencer Owners
Club. And some of these are indeed motorcycles. I wonder how many are
performance cars? One solution, the one adopted by Sharjah Police in January
this year, is to
ban motorcycles from Sharjah’s main roads after 10pm. This, instead of ticketing the driver of every antisocially-loud vehicle.
Typical government reaction is to legislate for ever more
stringent noise limits. Manufacturers comply with larger, heavier, more
complicated, and more expensive exhaust systems. This in turn encourages an
increased proportion of motorcyclists to switch to after-market systems. Reasons include saving weight and cost; another is to make the machine sound like a
motorcycle and not a sewing machine. I contend that if the legal limits were
set at a more easily achievable level, fewer bikers would replace their stock systems.
My own machine has a manufacturer’s plate stating “95dB(A) at
4400rpm.” It doesn’t specify a distance. When I bought an after-market silencer
(yes, I too dislike the gigantic 28lb bazooka dangling off my bike), one
feature that I liked was that
the manufacturer was extremely candid about how
noisy it was. 93dB(A) at 20 inches – the EPA test. This is an identical result
to the OEM system, and less than what's on the manufacturer's plate and what's engraved on the original silencer. The “race” performance full system from the same exhaust system company produces 99dB(A) at 20
inches, which is significantly louder but still below the EPA limit.
For cars, the limit set by the European Union from 2012 is
71dB(A). I’ve been unable to find the distance, nor the speed, nor even the
pavement surface. All these factors are significant. You experience around
80dB(A) from traffic when you stand on the kerb 5m from a busy road. I wonder,
given this 71dB(A) limit, why a Mustang, or a Lamborghini, or a Ferrari all seem to be
allowed, in standard manufacturer’s trim, to be significantly louder than
pretty much any stock motorcycle? I guess
most
cars are very quiet compared with motorbikes, and
most bikes are pretty quiet. Bikes are invisible anyway, so it’s generally assumed that all bikes: the ones that Mr Joseph Public
notices, are loud.
EDITED 21 April. I've discovered a source for how motorcycle noise is measured in Europe. It's EEC Directive 78/1015/EEC. The test, essentially, is to accelerate the bike over a 20m distance in second or third gear between two microphones 15m apart. I found a research paper that compared the results of the European Union test with a static test. It's here. In short, the static test produced sound pressure levels that were up to 13dB(A) higher than the EU drive-by test, with almost all results falling within two standard deviations of the drive-by mean. A factory standard Honda Fireblade produced 83dB(A) in the drive-by test and 95dB(A) in the static. That's equivalent to 83dB(A) at 2m.
I’ve tabulated some sound pressure levels below, all sucked
out of the intertubes and corrected to measurement at 2m, unless noted
otherwise:-
Noise source SPL at 2 metres
EU limit for cars 71dB(A) distance N/A
My bike at 5000rpm 81dB(A)
Inside A340 cattle class 85dB(A) distance N/A
Race exhaust for GTR 87dB(A)
Kerbside of busy road 88dB(A)
Inside London Tube train
94dB(A) distance N/A
EPA limit 98dB(A)
Performance horn 112dB(A)
Diesel truck 114dB(A)
ADDC Moto 115dB(A)
The situation with dodgy after-market exhausts has improved over recent years. Manufacturers
of many systems now dyno-develop them and get them
certified as road legal.
Beowulf in UK and
Staintune in Australia, for example.
The days of every chancer with a pipe bender and a supply of two-inch stainless
steel tube are almost over.
Oh, and lest we forget, these are
maximum noise levels. If you don’t ride around at maximum, wide-open throttle, your machine will be a lot quieter. Everyone, surely, owes it to common decency to keep the noise down when leaving at the crack of sparrowfart or getting home after a session of midnight oiling.
And then there are Harley-Davidsons. Mysteriously,these machines are “expected
to be loud” and, with the exception of residents of JBR who have to be up for work at 6am, are tolerated by everyone including the vehicle inspectors at registration time, whereas
riceburners have to sound like wristwatches…
Found on a HD forum:
Stock
muffler 98dB(A) (the EPA
limit, measured at 2 metres)
Aftermarket
107dB(A) Jeez…
]}:-{>