|
From https://blocked.org.uk |
There’s been quite a bit of news here in the UAE about the
new cyber-crimes law. It isn’t just to make hacking, phishing, scamming, and
virus uploading illegal. Defamation is a big issue too. The local media were
all abuzz a while ago when it turned out that, for example, it’s a criminal
offence to make an assault in a public place an item of common knowledge by
posting it on YouTube. It’s also potentially illegal to tag photographs on
Facebook without the owner of the face giving written consent. In fact, even
taking pictures of people turns out to be against the law, unless you have
written permission.
Here’s me imagining that someone gurning in front of a
camera gives that permission, but apparently not. Taking allegedly amusing
photos of the scenes of drunken debauchery at any one of Dubai’s
alcohol-fuelled Friday brunches could well lead to trouble, and we can see why.
Imagine that I get my inebriated mugshot uploaded and tagged. Then, without my
knowledge, it gets circulated by friends of friends of friends, and it lands in
the inbox of my hypothetical ultra-conservative boss. A very real possibility
of “Sayonara, Habibi!”
In practice, of course, the vast majority of pictures and
tags are just fine; everyone’s happy to appear on their Facebook friends’
timelines, and innocuous pictures of a few friends having a couple of jars will
not even be noticed, let alone commented upon.
A somewhat alarming part of the cyber-crimes law is that I
am apparently responsible for what other people post in my blog or Facebook
comments. I post a story, a few of my friends make comments, the thread goes off
at a tangent, and then someone in Australia posts a supposedly witty remark
concerning the intelligence and parentage of some prominent individual or
corporate entity here in the UAE. That defamatory post would now be my fault.
Hence the disclamatory footer on this blog. How can I
possibly be held responsible if a hyperlink to a third-party’s website leads to
something that someone, somewhere might find offensive?
The two local internet service providers in the UAE both
provide connections to the 'net solely through proxy servers. It is obviously
illegal to attempt to bypass the proxy, which automatically blocks gambling,
anti-Islam, porn, and a whole lot more besides. Anonymising software that
you can download from REDACTED is obviously not on an accessible website.
It’s coming to the United Kingdom too.
https://blocked.org.uk:
“The [British]
government is promoting filters to prevent children and young
people from seeing content that is supposed to be for over 18s. This includes
pornography and sites that talk about alcohol, smoking, anorexia and hate
speech.”
I checked, and according to the website, TalkTalk has blocked my
blog. There appears to be no way of contacting whatever faceless bureaucrat
made the decision (because it’s doubtless a machine). Attempts to contact
TalkTalk end when it becomes obvious that I don’t have an account with them.
And never shall I.
So read this blog while you still can. The Grumpy Goat: Too controversial for TalkTalk.
To end on a happy note, and I realise that it goes with the current season in the way that ice-cream goes with ketchup, but here’s an old joke that circulated
in Saudi Arabia a few years ago, on the run-up to the feasting season at the
end of December. We’re already used to euphemisms such as “Festive” and also “Special
Beverages” and even “Curly-Tailed Dog.” The UAE is, I'm pleased to report, much more relaxed than this.
Christmas
Dinner Menu
Champagne
Reception
Aperitif
Melon and Ham
Main Course
Roasted Christmas Turkey
Pork Chipolata Sausages
Roast potatoes
Vegetables
Red Wine Gravy
Choice of red or white Wine
Dessert
Christmas Pudding with Brandy Butter
To Finish
Port
and Cheese Board
Tea or Coffee
]}:-{>